Correcting, not punishing: a manager's training on corrective actions
Four parts, about two hours in total. Read the chapter, work through the lesson, practice in the workbook, then pass the quiz. Your answers stay in this browser, on this device.
Your progress
- ✓Chapter read
- ✓Lesson completed
- ✓Workbook finished
- ✓Quiz passed
Completion record
Paste it into an email to your HR contact or your Brabo HR partner.
Progress is saved only in this browser. Clearing site data removes it.
Who this is for
Supervisors and managers at Brabo client companies who are responsible for the day-to-day performance and conduct of a team. It assumes no HR background. It applies whether your company runs on Paylocity, ADP RUN, or another platform; the documentation steps for Paylocity are included because many Brabo clients use it.
This training is general guidance, not legal advice, and it does not replace your company's policies. For significant performance issues or misconduct, consult Human Resources or your Brabo HR partner, and legal counsel when needed, before you act.
Correcting, Not Punishing
A manager's guide to corrective actions: what they are, how to choose the right level, how to handle the hard cases, how to run the conversation, and how to document it so the record holds up.
Every manager eventually has an employee who is late too often, misses the mark on quality, ignores a procedure, or crosses a line with a coworker. What you do next shapes two things at once: whether that employee gets back on track, and whether your company can show later that it acted fairly and consistently.
Corrective action is the tool for both. This chapter explains what corrective actions are, how to decide whether to act and at what level, how to handle employees with medical conditions or protected time off, how to run the conversation, and how to document all of it.
Two notes before we start. First, nothing here replaces advice on a specific situation. For significant performance issues or misconduct, talk to Human Resources or your Brabo HR partner, and to legal counsel when needed, before you act. Second, the titles used here (documented coaching, verbal warning, and so on) are common ones. Your company may call them something else. A documented coaching might be an informal counseling; a written warning might be a formal warning or a reprimand. Use whatever titles your company has chosen, and use them consistently for every employee.
What corrective actions are
Corrective actions are the levels of guidance and disciplinary discussion a manager uses to address performance or conduct problems. They run from an informal coaching conversation up to termination, and each one should be matched to how serious the situation is. Some situations call for the most serious action right away: a final warning, a suspension, or termination. Many others start at the lowest level and move up one step at a time if the problem continues.
The purpose of every corrective action is the same: to correct the employee's performance or conduct, not to punish it, using the lowest level of action that will get the result you need. Even termination is not punishment. It is the step a company takes when an employee's performance or conduct is no longer compatible with continued employment.
That framing matters in practice. A manager who thinks of a warning as punishment tends to delay it, soften it, or deliver it with frustration. A manager who thinks of it as correction delivers it early, clearly, and calmly, and expects it to work.
Prevention: five habits that keep you out of the process
Managers play a large part in creating a productive workplace and high-performing employees. Most corrective actions are preventable, and managers who do the following consistently find they rarely need the formal steps.
- Set clear expectations. Tell every employee what the performance and conduct standards are for their role and your workplace. People cannot meet a standard they have never heard.
- Be available. Welcome questions and answer them. Build enough rapport that employees ask before they guess. Many errors come from misunderstanding or confusion, not carelessness.
- Be consistent. Hold everyone equally accountable to the same expectations. Inconsistency is unfair to the people who follow the rules, and it is the first thing a lawyer looks for later.
- Redirect as needed. When performance or conduct falls short, address it promptly to bring the employee back on track. Be specific about the concern and about the change you expect.
- Document. Keep detailed, accurate records of performance and conduct concerns and how you addressed them, including informal conversations.
A new line cook is plating slowly during the Friday rush. The sous chef who says, that night, "Here is the pace we need on a Friday, and here is how to set up your station so you can hit it," and jots a note about the conversation, has done more to prevent a warning than any form ever will.
Deciding whether to act, and at what level
When a problem does come up, assess the specific situation before you choose a level. Work through these factors:
- The circumstances of the performance or conduct concern, and any mitigating information.
- The overall performance of the employee or employees involved.
- Any prior conduct concerns or corrective actions.
- Consistency: if something similar happened before in your workplace, what action was taken then?
- Whether any employee involved has a medical condition that may have affected their performance or conduct.
- Whether an absence was protected under state sick time law.
- How the incident affected the business and its customers.
There is no fixed rule that says a certain issue always gets a certain level. The level depends on the factors above and on a review of all the relevant facts. For more serious situations, consult Human Resources before you decide.
Performance and conduct are different problems
Expect different results depending on which kind of problem you are correcting.
- Performance issues (quality, speed, accuracy, results). Tell the employee specifically how they are not meeting expectations and what performance you expect after the corrective action. Then give them a timeline or goal date to get there. Improvement takes practice, so time is part of the plan.
- Conduct issues (attendance, policy violations, behavior toward others). The employee is expected to correct the behavior immediately, with no further occurrences. An employee with a tardiness problem does not get two weeks to stop being late. They are expected to be on time starting with their next shift.
"I need your intake forms to be complete and error-free. We will review a sample together on November 1."
"I expect you to be clocked in and at your station by 7:00 every scheduled shift, starting tomorrow."
Employees with medical conditions or on medical leave
When an employee has a medical condition, or is on or may need medical leave, you must consider whether the medical issue may have affected their performance or conduct. This does not mean employees with medical conditions cannot receive corrective action. They are held accountable like everyone else. But discuss the situation with Human Resources before you issue anything.
Here is how it typically plays out. An employee is unable to work their scheduled shift three days in a row and says there was a medical reason. You contact Human Resources, and you may need to talk with the employee about medical leave.
- If the employee does not apply for medical leave, the absences can then be considered for corrective action.
- If the employee applies for leave, wait to see whether the leave is approved for the days missed before considering corrective action.
- Either way, if the employee did not follow your company's call-out procedure, and that failure was not because of a medical reason, it can be addressed as a failure to follow procedures.
Human Resources will advise on the best course of action.
Pay attention whenever an employee mentions a medical condition, even one that sounds minor, alongside a performance or conduct concern. Do not discuss the specifics of the condition with the employee. After consulting Human Resources, you may talk with them about the availability of medical leave.
Know your state's protected sick time rules. In many states, employees may take unscheduled sick time for allowable purposes and are protected from discipline for taking it. In Massachusetts, for example, time used under the Earned Sick Time law is protected. Ask Human Resources or your legal partner for guidance on each state where your employees work.
A home health aide misses three scheduled visits and tells the scheduler afterward that she "had a health thing." The scheduler does not ask what it was. She calls her Brabo HR partner the same day, and the conversation with the aide is about whether she wants information on medical leave. Whether the missed visits become a corrective action depends on what happens next, and whether the aide followed the call-out procedure.
The ladder: five levels of corrective action
Most companies use five levels, from lowest to highest. The names can vary. The sequence should not.
Informal conversation, documented. Lowest-level concerns.
More formal. Coaching did not work, or the issue needs more than a chat.
Formal letter in the personnel file. Serious, not yet final.
Last chance before termination is considered.
Performance or conduct not compatible with continued employment.
Documented coaching
The lowest level, used for the lowest-level performance or conduct concerns. It can be a verbal conversation in the moment or a short, informal meeting. The conversation has three parts: try to understand the reason for the problem; clarify the expectation for performance or conduct; and make sure the employee knows to come to you with questions or concerns.
Then document it, in your manager notes, as a Paylocity journal entry, or in a follow-up email to the employee that recaps what you discussed. The documentation matters even though the action is informal: it builds the employee's history and feeds performance reviews.
One more thing. Tell the employee that the conversation is a documented coaching. They need to understand that they are being held accountable with a corrective action, not just having a chat.
- Document as
- Manager notes, a Paylocity journal entry, or a recap email to the employee
- Tell the employee
- "This is a documented coaching."
- From the guide
- An employee is late for the first time, with no extenuating circumstances.
An assistant teacher forgets to log the afternoon headcount once. The lead teacher coaches her the same day, shows her where the sheet lives and why the count matters, names it as a documented coaching, and sends a two-line recap email.
Verbal warning
A step up in formality, in both the discussion and the documentation. Use it when a documented coaching has not fixed the problem, or when a new issue is serious enough that an informal conversation is not sufficient.
The conversation is more direct than a coaching: explain clearly how the employee's performance or conduct was inappropriate and what must change. Document it more formally, for example as a Paylocity journal entry. Tell the employee plainly that they are receiving a verbal warning, and that if the issue continues they may receive further disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment.
- Document as
- A formal record, such as a Paylocity journal entry
- Tell the employee
- "This is a verbal warning. If this continues, you may receive further disciplinary action, up to and including termination."
- From the guide
- An employee keeps arriving late after a documented coaching. Two employees have a loud verbal argument in the workplace in front of customers.
A machine operator was coached last month for arriving after the 6:00 line start. This week he arrived late twice more. His supervisor meets with him, walks through the dates, names it a verbal warning, and records it in Paylocity that afternoon.
Written warning
A formal corrective action for serious concerns that do not quite rise to a final warning, suspension, or termination. The employee must understand that the issue is serious enough to warrant the highest levels of action if it continues. The warning is a formal letter that goes in the employee's personnel file.
When you draft it, include language that tells the employee they may face more severe corrective action or termination if the issue continues. The recommended sentence:
"Failure to meet this expectation or any additional incidents of misconduct may result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment."
Be careful with the verb. Say may, not will. Every future action depends on its own circumstances, and a promise you cannot keep weakens the record.
- Document as
- A formal letter, included in the personnel file
- Tell the employee
- That the issue is serious, and that further incidents may result in action up to and including termination
- From the guide
- Repeated tardiness after prior corrective actions. An employee purposely refusing to follow a manager's direction (insubordination).
A foreman tells an apprentice to re-run a cable through conduit as the drawings require. The apprentice refuses and tells him to do it himself. That is insubordination, and after a call to HR the company issues a written warning.
Final warning and suspension
These two are close in seriousness. A final warning communicates the critical nature of the employee's performance or conduct problem and gives them a final chance to correct it before termination is considered. When you deliver it, be unmistakably clear that immediate correction is needed to avoid termination.
A suspension is used for very serious failures to perform duties or significant misconduct. It is imposed in increments of hours or days during which the employee cannot work and does not receive pay. Employees should not be allowed to use vacation or sick time to make up for the suspension period. The point is to correct the problem immediately and communicate how serious it was.
Usually, by the time you are at this level, the performance or misconduct would be serious enough to warrant termination. You use a final warning or suspension instead when you believe the employee can still be a valuable member of the company but needs substantial correction.
- Document as
- A formal letter in the personnel file, stating the suspension dates if any
- Tell the employee
- That immediate correction is required to avoid termination
- From the guide
- A front-line manager makes a significant error in judgment, or fails to follow procedures with a customer, and it costs the company money or harms its reputation. An employee who shows potential has continued to miss expectations after prior corrective actions.
- Not for
- A suspension is not the tool for an employee whose performance simply does not meet minimum expectations.
An account manager skips the firm's conflict-check procedure to get a new client signed before quarter end. The conflict surfaces a month later and the firm has to withdraw, refunding the retainer. He has been strong otherwise. The partners issue a final warning with a two-day unpaid suspension rather than terminating.
Termination
Termination is used when the employee's performance or conduct is not compatible with continued employment: either all prior efforts to resolve the problem have failed, or the employee engaged in gross misconduct that warrants immediate removal from the company.
For at-will employees, best practice is to give the employee only a high-level reason for the termination, without specific details. "Failing to perform duties" or "policy violation" is sufficient. Involve Human Resources before any termination.
- From the guide
- An employee still fails to perform after documented coaching, a verbal warning, and written warnings. An employee is found to have engaged in physical violence or sexual harassment in the workplace.
- At-will note
- Give a high-level reason only. Involve HR first.
Your role in the conversation
How you run the conversation directly influences whether the employee understands the expectation, is willing to improve, and succeeds in making the change. Five moves:
- Prepare and review the issue. Review the facts, prior discussions or disciplinary actions, applicable policies, and supporting information before the meeting. Confirm that you understand the issue and can support it with specific examples.
- Discuss the concern with the employee. Explain the performance or conduct issue clearly, professionally, and factually. For early-stage counseling, keep it collaborative and focused on finding solutions.
- Explain the impact. Help the employee understand how the issue affects their responsibilities, coworkers, workflow, customers, or the organization. Impact is what makes the correction matter.
- Establish clear expectations. Say exactly what must change: specific actions, measurable expectations, deadlines, and follow-up dates.
- Escalate repeated or serious issues. Do not keep counseling the same unresolved issue. If the concern continues, address it with a more severe action.
Documentation that holds up
Documentation is the backbone of the process. It shows what the employee's concerns were and every action taken to correct them. You will rely on it when writing performance reviews, when considering further action, and if a legal matter ever arises. Ask Human Resources or your legal partner for templates for each level. Every record should include:
- Basic meeting and employee information. The date of the discussion or action, who was present, the type of corrective action issued, and whether Human Resources or another manager participated.
- A specific description of the issue. The performance, attendance, conduct, or policy concern in objective facts and specific examples, with relevant dates, incidents, policy provisions, or supporting evidence.
- Prior discussions and disciplinary history. Relevant counseling sessions, verbal warnings, written warnings, or other actions. The record should show the company's earlier efforts to address the issue.
- Workplace impact. How the concern affected the employee's role, coworkers, customers, operations, productivity, safety, or the organization.
- Expectations and improvement requirements. Exactly what the employee is expected to do differently, with measurable goals, deadlines, follow-up periods, and any training, resources, or support being provided.
"Maria has a bad attitude and does not respect the shift lead."
"On 10/6 and 10/9, Maria declined two assignments from the shift lead and said she was 'not doing that.' Both assignments were within her job description."
Documenting in Paylocity
If your company uses Paylocity, record corrective actions as journal entries in the Performance module. Every journal entry there is considered part of the employee's personnel file, so entries must be accurate and professional.
- Open the Performance module and click Journals.
- Select Create a Journal. Use the Note template, or a more specific template if one is available for the issue and the corrective action.
- Enter the pertinent information. Include every element from the documentation checklist above. Attach relevant emails or documents. Add contributors if other managers have relevant information about the situation.
- Save as a confidential memo. Turn on Make Journal Private if the entry is for internal records only, then click Save.
- Share with the employee (optional). Turn on Add About Person(s) to add the employee, save the entry as a draft for employee review, share the documentation with the employee, then click Save.
If your company runs on a different platform, keep the same content in that system's employee notes or in a secure personnel file. Your Brabo HR partner can tell you where documentation should live.
- Corrective action corrects; it does not punish. Use the lowest level that will get the result.
- Prevention is five habits: clear expectations, availability, consistency, timely redirection, and documentation.
- There is no fixed level for a given issue. Weigh the circumstances, the employee's record, consistency with past cases, medical factors, protected time, and business impact. Consult HR for serious situations.
- Performance gets a timeline. Conduct gets corrected immediately.
- When a medical condition is mentioned, do not probe it. Call HR before issuing anything.
- Name the level out loud, use "may" not "will," and document every level, including coaching.
Key terms
An employment relationship either party can end at any time, for any lawful reason. Best practice at termination is still a high-level reason, not silence or a detailed account.
Any of the levels of guidance or disciplinary discussion used to address a performance or conduct issue, from documented coaching to termination.
The lowest level: an informal conversation that is recorded and named to the employee as a corrective action.
Purposely refusing to follow a manager's reasonable direction. The guide's example of a written-warning-level concern.
Facts that reduce the seriousness of an incident or explain it, such as a first offense, a misunderstanding, or circumstances outside the employee's control.
The employee's official employment record. Written warnings go there, and Paylocity Performance journal entries are considered part of it.
Time off that state law allows for specified purposes and shields from discipline. Rules differ by state; ask HR.
Unpaid time away from work, in hours or days, for very serious failures to perform or significant misconduct. Not covered by vacation or sick time.
Choosing the Level and Running the Conversation
Six segments that turn the chapter into judgment you can use on Monday. Each one has a key idea, the teaching points, and a check-in with the answer hidden until you want it. Work alone, or use the facilitator notes at the end to run it live.
- Explain the purpose of corrective action and why it is correction, not punishment.
- Apply the seven factors to choose an appropriate level for a situation, and explain when to involve HR.
- Distinguish performance from conduct issues and set the right expectation for each.
- Recognize when a medical condition or protected time off changes your next step.
- Run a corrective action conversation using the five moves, including naming the level and using the required language.
- Write documentation that includes the five required elements.
1. The mindset
5 minThe lowest level of action that will get the result. That is the whole philosophy.
Corrective action exists to fix a problem, not to make a point. Managers who treat warnings as punishment delay them until they are angry, and then the conversation is about the anger. Managers who treat them as correction act early, while the problem is still small and the fix is still cheap. Termination is not punishment either. It is what a company does when performance or conduct is no longer compatible with continued employment.
Notice what this does to timing. The best moment for a documented coaching is the first time the problem shows up, not the fourth time. You are not "letting it slide" by coaching early; you are starting the record and giving the employee the earliest chance to fix it.
Check-in: A manager says, "I'm going to let it go a few more times so I have enough to write him up." What is wrong with that?
Three things. It delays correction, so the employee keeps doing the thing nobody has told him to stop. It treats the process as building a case rather than fixing a problem. And it skips the lowest level: the right move today is a documented coaching, which starts the record. If the behavior continues after that, the next step is already clear.
2. Five habits that prevent most of this
8 minClear expectations, availability, consistency, timely redirection, documentation.
Run through the five habits from the chapter and be honest about which one your team is weakest at. In most workplaces it is one of two: expectations that live in the manager's head rather than in writing, or inconsistency, where one person's lateness is tolerated because they are a strong performer and another's is not.
Consistency deserves a closer look. It is not only fairness. If two employees do the same thing and receive different levels of action, the company has to be able to explain why, and "I like one of them more" is not an answer. Prior incidents in your workplace are one of the seven factors precisely because of this.
Check-in: A restaurant manager with high turnover says new hires "should know" the uniform policy. Which habit is missing?
Set clear expectations. "Should know" is not the same as "was told." If the policy is not communicated at hire and reinforced, the first corrective action for a uniform violation is on shaky ground. Being available matters too: a new hire who feels able to ask "is this okay to wear?" rarely needs to be corrected for it.
3. Choosing the level
15 minSeven factors, no fixed rule, and HR for anything serious.
The seven factors: the circumstances and any mitigating information; the employee's overall performance; prior concerns or corrective actions; consistency with similar past incidents; whether a medical condition may be involved; whether an absence was protected sick time; and the impact on the business and customers. Weigh all of them before you pick a rung on the ladder.
Then decide what kind of problem it is. Performance gets specific gaps, a specific target, and a timeline. Conduct gets corrected immediately with no further occurrences.
Worked example: the late server
| What happened | Level | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Late once, no extenuating circumstances | Documented coaching | Lowest-level concern, first occurrence. Named as a coaching, documented. |
| Late again after the coaching | Verbal warning | The coaching did not correct it. More direct, formally documented, consequence language used. |
| Repeated lateness after both prior actions | Written warning | Serious enough to warrant the highest levels if it continues. Formal letter in the personnel file. |
| Still late, but the employee shows real potential | Final warning | A last chance, with immediate correction required. (A suspension is not used for performance that simply does not meet expectations.) |
| Still late after the final warning | Termination | All prior efforts have failed. HR involved; high-level reason given. |
Notice that at every step the expectation was the same: be on time starting with the next shift. Lateness is conduct, so there was never a two-week improvement window. Notice also where HR enters: the manager consults HR as the levels get more serious, and always before a final warning, suspension, or termination.
Check-in: Two employees have the same loud argument in front of customers. Employee A has no history. Employee B received a written warning for the same thing last quarter. Same level for both?
Not necessarily, and probably not. Prior corrective actions are one of the seven factors. For Employee A, the guide's example points to a verbal warning. For Employee B, the written warning already told him that further incidents may result in action up to and including termination, so a final warning or suspension is on the table. Consistency does not mean identical outcomes for different records; it means the same reasoning applied the same way. Consult HR before issuing either.
4. Medical conditions and protected time
10 minWhen a medical condition is mentioned, stop, do not probe, and call HR before issuing anything.
Employees with medical conditions are still accountable. What changes is your sequence. Before any corrective action you consider whether the condition may have affected the performance or conduct, and you discuss the situation with HR first.
Walk through the chapter's three-day absence example and notice the branches. No leave application: the absences can be considered for corrective action. Leave applied for: wait for the decision on those days. Call-out procedure not followed for a non-medical reason: that can be addressed on its own. In every branch, HR advises.
Two rules to carry into every conversation. Do not discuss the specifics of a medical condition with the employee. And treat "it was a health thing" as a signal to pause, even when it sounds minor.
Check-in: You raise missed deadlines with an employee and she says, "Honestly my anxiety has been really bad lately." What do you do?
Acknowledge it briefly, do not ask about the condition, and do not issue a corrective action in that meeting. Consult HR before taking any action. HR may have you talk with her about the availability of medical leave. She remains accountable for the deadlines, but the level and timing of any action are decided after HR weighs in. Document the conversation factually, including that she raised a medical concern, without detail about the condition.
5. The conversation
15 minPrepare, discuss, explain the impact, set the expectation, and escalate when you must.
Three things managers most often leave out: the specific dates and facts (so the conversation turns into a debate about impressions), the impact (so the employee hears a preference rather than a problem), and the name of the level (so the employee walks out thinking it was a chat). Name it. "This is a verbal warning." At the written warning level and above, use the recommended consequence sentence, with may, not will.
Model conversation: a verbal warning for continued lateness
Check-in: What is missing from this version: "Hey, you've got to stop being late, okay? Thanks."
Almost everything that makes it a corrective action: the specific dates, the prior coaching, the impact on coworkers and the operation, a clear expectation with a start point, the name of the level, the consequence language, an invitation to raise anything the manager should know, a follow-up date, and documentation afterward.
6. Documentation and Paylocity
7 minFive elements in every record: basics, the issue, the history, the impact, the expectations.
Write for a reader who was not in the room and knows nothing about the employee. Dates, names, what was said, what policy applies, what was agreed. Keep opinions out. "Unprofessional" is a conclusion; what the employee said and did is evidence.
In Paylocity, journal entries in the Performance module are part of the personnel file. Use the Note template (or a more specific one), attach supporting emails, add contributors who have relevant information, mark the entry private if it is for internal records, and share with the employee if your process calls for it.
Check-in: Which sentence belongs in the record? (a) "Maria has a bad attitude." (b) "On 10/6 and 10/9, Maria declined two assignments from the shift lead and said she was 'not doing that.'"
(b). It is dated, specific, and observable. Anyone reading it later can see what happened. Sentence (a) is an interpretation that the employee can simply deny.
Facilitator notes
If you are delivering this live (in person or over Zoom), the segment timings above add up to 60 minutes. Suggested flow:
| Time | Segment | How to run it |
|---|---|---|
| 0:00 | Open | Ask each manager for one situation they wish they had handled earlier. No names. |
| 0:05 | 1 and 2 | Teach the mindset and the five habits. Poll: which habit is your team weakest at? |
| 0:15 | 3 | Teach the factors and the ladder, then run Workbook Exercise 1 in pairs or breakout rooms. Debrief two scenarios as a group. |
| 0:32 | 4 | Walk the three-day absence example. Emphasize the two rules. |
| 0:40 | 5 | Read the model conversation aloud with a volunteer. Then run Workbook Exercise 3 individually. |
| 0:53 | 6 | Teach the five elements. Assign Workbook Exercises 4 and 6 and the quiz as follow-up work. |
| 0:58 | Close | Each manager names the one thing they will do differently this week. |
Materials: this page (share the link), the company's corrective action templates from HR, and the company's call-out and attendance policies. Keep the Brabo HR partner's contact information on the screen at the close.
Workbook
Six exercises that pair with the lesson. Write your answer first, then open the suggested answer. Your answers save automatically in this browser; you can copy or download them when you are done.
Exercise 1: Pick the level
For each scenario, choose the level you would consider and explain why in one or two sentences. Assume the company uses the five standard levels.
A. Restaurant. A server with no prior issues arrives ten minutes late for one shift. There were no extenuating circumstances.
Suggested answer
Documented coaching. First occurrence, lowest-level concern, no mitigating circumstances. Name it as a coaching, clarify the start-time expectation (immediately, since it is conduct), and record it.
B. Manufacturing. A machine operator received a documented coaching last month for arriving after the 6:00 line start. This week he arrived late twice more.
Suggested answer
Verbal warning. The coaching did not correct the behavior. The conversation is more direct, the record is formal (a Paylocity journal entry), and the employee is told that continued lateness may result in further action up to and including termination.
C. Child care. Two teachers have a loud argument in the hallway during pickup, in front of parents. Neither has any prior corrective actions.
Suggested answer
Verbal warning is the guide's example for a loud argument in front of customers with no prior history. A new issue can start above documented coaching when it is too serious for an informal conversation. Weigh the circumstances (who started it, what was said, impact on the families present) and consult HR; the facts could move it higher.
D. Trades. A foreman tells an apprentice to re-run a cable the way the drawings require. The apprentice refuses and says, "Do it yourself."
Suggested answer
Written warning. Purposely refusing a manager's direction is insubordination, the guide's example of a concern that requires formal documentation. A formal letter goes in the personnel file with the recommended consequence language. Consult HR.
E. Home care. A scheduling supervisor skips the required credential check and sends an unverified caregiver to a client's home. The client finds out and cancels services, and the agency refunds the month.
Suggested answer
Final warning or suspension, with HR involved. A front-line manager failed to follow procedures involving a customer, causing a monetary loss and harm to the agency's reputation. This is the guide's example for level four. If the supervisor has been strong otherwise and the company believes she can still be valuable, a final warning or an unpaid suspension gives her a last chance. If not, termination is on the table.
F. Professional services. An account coordinator has had a documented coaching, a verbal warning, and a written warning in the past five months for missed client deadlines. This week she missed another major one.
Suggested answer
Final warning or termination, decided with HR. The prior efforts have failed, which is the guide's example for termination. A final warning is the alternative if the company believes she shows potential and can still succeed with substantial correction. A suspension is not the tool here; this is performance that is not meeting expectations, not significant misconduct.
Exercise 2: Performance or conduct?
Classify each issue, then write the expectation you would set. Remember: performance gets a specific target and a timeline; conduct is corrected immediately.
1. A packer has missed the daily output target for the third week in a row.
Suggested answer
Performance. State the target in numbers, confirm the employee has the training and equipment to hit it, and set a goal date and a follow-up, for example: "Meet the 140-unit daily target by the week of November 3; we will review your numbers every Friday until then."
2. A line cook uses his phone on the line, which the kitchen policy prohibits.
Suggested answer
Conduct. It is a policy violation, so the expectation is immediate: "No phone on the line during service, starting now. If there is an emergency you need to be reachable for, tell me before the shift and we will arrange it."
3. A bookkeeper's monthly reconciliations have had calculation errors three months running.
Suggested answer
Performance. Be specific about the errors, provide any training or checklist that would help, and set a date: "The October reconciliation, due November 10, must tie out with no errors. Use the review checklist and send it to me for a second look before you close."
4. A caregiver leaves a shift forty minutes early without telling anyone.
Suggested answer
Conduct. Leaving early without notice is an attendance and procedure issue, and in care settings it can leave a client uncovered. The expectation is immediate: "Work every scheduled shift to its end, and if you must leave early, get approval from the supervisor on duty first, starting today." First ask whether there was a medical or emergency reason, and if a medical reason is mentioned, pause and consult HR.
5. A front-desk coordinator is not following the new intake checklist two weeks after being trained on it.
Suggested answer
Could be either, and the coaching conversation is how you find out. If she is trying and struggling, it is performance: retrain, set a date, follow up. If she understands the checklist and is choosing not to use it, it is conduct: use the checklist on every intake starting today. The first move is the same either way: understand the reason, clarify the expectation, document it as a coaching.
Exercise 3: Fix the sentence
Each sentence below came from a draft warning. Rewrite it so it would hold up in the personnel file.
1. "If you are late again you will be fired."
Suggested answer
"Failure to meet this expectation or any additional incidents of misconduct may result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment." The original promises a specific outcome ("will be fired"); every future action depends on its own circumstances, so the record says may.
2. "Your attitude needs to improve."
Suggested answer
Replace the conclusion with the observable behavior and a measurable expectation, for example: "On October 3 and October 9, you interrupted coworkers during the morning huddle and refused the assignment given by the shift lead. The expectation is that you accept assignments from the shift lead and raise any concerns with me privately, starting immediately."
3. "We've talked about this a lot."
Suggested answer
Cite the history by date and level: "This issue was addressed in a documented coaching on August 14 and a verbal warning on September 22. Despite those conversations, the behavior has continued." The record needs to show the company's earlier efforts, and "a lot" shows nothing.
Exercise 4: Documentation drill
Read the scenario, then write the five required elements as you would enter them in a Paylocity journal entry.
Hotel front desk. Sam Rivera, a front desk agent, was coached verbally on September 12 (documented in a recap email) after the cash drawer he closed was $60 short. On October 8 his drawer was $140 short. The close-out procedure requires a second count by the shift supervisor, which Sam skipped both times. You (the front office manager) met with Sam on October 10 with the shift supervisor, Dana Cho, present, and issued a verbal warning. You will re-count his drawer with him for the next two weeks and follow up on October 24.
Model entry
Basic information. October 10, 2026. Verbal warning issued to Sam Rivera, Front Desk Agent, by [your name], Front Office Manager. Present: Dana Cho, Shift Supervisor. HR not present; HR consulted on October 9.
Description of the issue. On October 8, 2026, the cash drawer Sam closed was $140 short. Per the Cash Handling Procedure (section 4.2), every close-out requires a second count by the shift supervisor before the drawer is sealed. Sam did not request a second count. Variance report and the close-out log are attached.
Prior history. September 12, 2026: documented coaching for a $60 shortage on a drawer closed without a second count. Recap email of the same date attached.
Workplace impact. Unreconciled cash shortages of $200 in two months; additional supervisor time to investigate and re-count; the hotel cannot determine whether the variance is error or loss when the procedure is skipped.
Expectations. Effective immediately, Sam will request and obtain a supervisor second count on every close-out before sealing the drawer. For the two weeks ending October 24, the manager will re-count each drawer with Sam. Follow-up meeting October 24, 2026. Failure to meet this expectation or any additional incidents may result in further disciplinary action, up to and including termination of employment. Sam was informed that this is a verbal warning.
Exercise 5: The medical-leave decision path
Answer each question before opening the guidance.
A machinist does not show up for three scheduled shifts. The company call-out policy requires a call to the supervisor at least one hour before the shift. He did not call. On the third day he texts, "Sorry, I was in the hospital."
Guidance
Contact Human Resources (or your Brabo HR partner) before doing anything else. You may need to talk with the employee about medical leave. Do not issue a corrective action for the absences at this point.
Guidance
No. Do not discuss the specifics of a medical condition with the employee. After consulting HR, you may talk with him about the availability of medical leave. HR handles any documentation the leave process requires.
Guidance
Yes, with HR's advice. If the employee does not apply for leave, the absences can be considered for corrective action. If he had applied, you would wait to see whether the leave was approved for those days.
Guidance
The call-out procedure. If he did not follow it, and the failure to call was not itself because of the medical situation (for example, he was able to text but chose not to call), the failure to follow procedures can be addressed as a corrective action on its own. If the medical situation made calling impossible, it should not be. HR advises on the right course.
Exercise 6: Plan a real conversation
Pick a situation on your team that needs a corrective action, or a recent one you would like to have handled better. Use initials rather than names if you plan to share this workbook.
Finish the workbook
Copy your answers to paste into an email, or download them as a text file, then mark the workbook finished.
Quiz
Sixteen questions on the chapter and lesson. Answer them all, then check your work. You will see the correct answer and the reason for each one. The pass mark is 13 of 16, and you can retake it as many times as you like.